Lenovo 80EC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80EC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5B3
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160727
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 14 '21 at 17:44
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-7500 APU (2014 M.Ka)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Memory 53.6
1-Core 37.8
2-Core 58.5
33% 50 Pts
4-Core 87
8-Core 86.8
12% 86.9 Pts
64-Core 86.9
5% 86.9 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3988) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 6
3% 4.67 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF870400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 85 89 99 90 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 362
Write 140
Mixed 175
SusWrite 98.5
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 11.6
49% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 86.3
DQ Mixed 19.8
37% 73.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 55%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
599GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 69 73 76 75 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 70
Mixed 37
SusWrite 71.6
43% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 61%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
275GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.9 4.1 4.7 4.7 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.09% Terrible
Read 5.7
Write 4.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.3
6% 4.85 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 2.09%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 5.3
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80EC Builds (Compare 232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80EC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback