Asus VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop E406SAS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook 14_ASUS Laptop E406SAS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E406SAS
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190724
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 14 '21 at 17:18
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron N3000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.05 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Memory 33.7
1-Core 18.3
2-Core 17.5
18% 23.2 Pts
4-Core 19
8-Core 10.7
2% 14.9 Pts
64-Core 12.5
1% 12.5 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Asus(1043 1F00) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5107
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.4% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 2.5
1% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.9
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.4%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5674EB0-YK0 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
4.62% Terrible
MC Read 1.2
MC Write 0.1
MC Mixed 2
3% 1.1 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 0.8
5% 1.8 GB/s
Latency 234
17% 234 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 4.62%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback