Huananzhi X99-TF

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Huananzhi X99-TF (all builds)
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-TF
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200826
Uptime	9.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '21 at 12:00
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 6,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 61.8 2-Core 151 59% 99.2 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 650 55% 472 Pts	64-Core 1,322 82% 1,322 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 8094) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.96% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 1.3 1% 1.73 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.96% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 85 92 89 87 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48% Average	Read 272 Write 121 Mixed 170 SusWrite 89.5 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 59.9 4K Mixed 21 90% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 84.5 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 104 79% 104 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 75%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 403GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 120 118 119 117 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 122 Write 115 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 119 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 397GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 109 114 116 116 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 120 Write 113 Mixed 73.8 SusWrite 111 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 2x8GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.1% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 13.7 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 14.9 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-TF Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

System: Huananzhi X99-TF

CPU
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples	199x
Xeon E5-2673 v3IntelBench 70%, 592 samples	17x
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	20x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	19x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	15x

SSD
SA2000M8250G 250GBKingstonBench 171%, 42,173 samples	9x
NE-512 512GBBench 177%, 5,933 samples	6x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	6x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	11x
Atermiter 4x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 483 samples	8x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16