Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2320-$165 38,345 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 80.3 2-Core 145 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 318 43% 321 Pts	64-Core 316 20% 316 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	8.65% Terrible	Lighting 9.6 Reflection 12.8 Parallax 12.5 8% 11.6 fps	MRender 14.2 Gravity 12.6 Splatting 11.3 10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.65% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 158 158 158 158 156 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.9% Good	Read 255 Write 242 Mixed 230 SusWrite 163 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 49.7 4K Mixed 36.1 118% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 198 149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 124%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 298GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 116 116 116 116 116 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 110 Write 63.8 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 115 65% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x2GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	48.4% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.2 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.2 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16