Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF (all builds)
Memory	55 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '21 at 06:48
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Memory 94.7 1-Core 159 2-Core 291 101% 182 Pts	4-Core 633 8-Core 1,265 112% 949 Pts	64-Core 1,215 75% 1,215 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 105%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	6.33% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 10.5 Parallax 9 5% 8.53 fps	MRender 12.2 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 12.3 9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.33% Great: 7%
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.1 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.1% Above average	Lighting 65.8 Reflection 63.8 Parallax 89.4 54% 73 fps	MRender 66.3 Gravity 71.5 Splatting 47.7 49% 61.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 366GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 422 420 444 417 448 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 441 Mixed 462 SusWrite 433 104% 462 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 68.5 4K Mixed 45.6 154% 51.1 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 232 179% 251 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 114GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,543 Write 2,094 Mixed 1638 464% 2,092 MB/s	4K Read 60.7 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 62.6 205% 61.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,284 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 194 267% 526 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 147GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 436 416 445 415 440 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 477 Mixed 463 SusWrite 434 106% 471 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 59.6 4K Mixed 44.5 150% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 94.8 DQ Mixed 181 148% 219 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 133%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 627GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 148 148 154 146 153 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	73% Very good	Read 106 Write 105 Mixed 43.9 SusWrite 149 73% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 112%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 146 143 152 143 151 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	78% Very good	Read 123 Write 135 Mixed 68.7 SusWrite 148 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.7 235% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 113%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 539GB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 164 165 161 162 174 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	93% Outstanding	Read 159 Write 160 Mixed 73 SusWrite 164 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.6 202% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB 971 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 39.2 MC Write 42.9 MC Mixed 34.8 111% 39 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 46.2 SC Mixed 31.3 96% 33.6 GB/s	Latency 58 69% 58 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 156%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	961x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	285x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	108x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	106x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	104x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	97x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	165x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	137x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	89x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	46x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	44x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $790

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16