Asus P8P67 LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 LE (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1216 x 684 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110509
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '21 at 05:28
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Memory 95.7 1-Core 100 2-Core 201 77% 132 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 409 56% 413 Pts	64-Core 409 25% 409 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Asus(1043 838B) 1GB CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Lighting 22 Reflection 29 Parallax 22.1 18% 24.4 fps	MRender 27.8 Gravity 20.9 Splatting 18.5 18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 420GB free (System drive) Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 29 38 44 36 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 56.5 Write 53.6 Mixed 42.1 SusWrite 38.6 35% 47.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 76%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 4GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 7 7.1 6.8 7.2 7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	6.08% Terrible	Read 24.3 Write 6.2 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 7.4 14% 12.5 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.08% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-198.A00LF 2x4GB 1,746 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.5% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 10.8 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 11.4 34% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 55 73% 55 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 LE Builds (Compare 1,233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 LE - $113

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	308x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	229x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	212x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	86x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	82x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	72x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	52x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	26x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	17x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $639

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16