Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '21 at 04:28
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Memory 96.3 1-Core 119 2-Core 235 86% 150 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 607 66% 524 Pts	64-Core 603 37% 603 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Zotac(19DA 288A) 1GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Lighting 21.4 Reflection 18.1 Parallax 20.8 17% 20.1 fps	MRender 25 Gravity 22.9 Splatting 16.7 17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300 9,430 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.2.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 191 220 219 218 218 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 409 Write 282 Mixed 293 SusWrite 203 66% 297 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 91.3 4K Mixed 42.1 150% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 239 183% 249 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 89%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 455GB free Firmware: 17.01H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 118 119 119 118 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 116 Write 112 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 118 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 M378B1G73BH0-CK0 16GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1867, 1867 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	68.7% Good	MC Read 24.3 MC Write 24.4 MC Mixed 21.8 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.3 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 21.7 60% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 53.1 75% 53.1 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	184x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	170x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	154x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	53x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	50x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	48x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	20x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 2,134 samples	15x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $650

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16