| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NP270E4E-KD2BR |
| Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130629 |
| Uptime | 2.2 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 14 '21 at 03:46 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 54% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron 847-$259
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
|
38.1%
Below average
|
35% 50.8 Pts
|
7% 49.5 Pts
|
3% 53.7 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C708) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
0.61%
Terrible
|
1% 0.77 fps
|
1% 0.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 137 81 112 102 56 MB/s
|
37.6%
Below average
|
68% 306 MB/s
|
37% 10.6 MB/s
|
21% 52.8 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Smart SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.3%
Below average
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
19% 6.8 GB/s
|
37% 107 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV Builds (Compare 124 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples | 41x |
| Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples | 22x |
| Celeron 1007UIntelBench 39%, 5,995 samples | 21x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $98 |