MSI Z87 MPOWER (MS-7818)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7818
MotherboardMSI Z87 MPOWER (MS-7818)  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130416
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateApr 14 '21 at 00:21
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 206
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 341
45% 339 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 140
Parallax 130
106% 133 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 139
Splatting 119
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 39 42 39 40 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 426
Mixed 379
SusWrite 57.4
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 49.6
172% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 232
209% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275
538GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 341 346 355 355 357 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 354
Write 357
Mixed 332
SusWrite 343
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 48.6
163% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 225
171% 232 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 133%
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB
171GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 80 82 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 102
Write 94.8
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 78.4
64% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
230GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 74 74 75 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 59.2
Write 58.2
Mixed 46.9
SusWrite 73.6
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 80GB (2007)-$75
2GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 74.4
Write 75.9
Mixed 51.7
50% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 49%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 117 121 120 119 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 125
Write 105
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 117
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.9% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 11.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87 MPOWER (MS-7818) Builds (Compare 430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z87 MPOWER (MS-7818) - $252

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $584
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback