Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6820HQ 33,920 User benchmarks, average bench 60% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 73.5 1-Core 109 2-Core 213 73% 132 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 468 48% 385 Pts	64-Core 466 29% 466 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1000M 6,377 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 8108) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.69 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.74% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 4.5 4% 4.4 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 4.6 Splatting 4.5 4% 5 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 3.74% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 14,022 User benchmarks, average bench 160% 427GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57HA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 852 Write 580 Mixed 687 157% 706 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 49.4 157% 63.6 MB/s	DQ Read 986 DQ Write 737 DQ Mixed 635 536% 786 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 235%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 2x16GB 5,073 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 23.3 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 30 SC Mixed 23.2 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 93.6 43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 75%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	405x
Quadro M1000MNvidiaBench 13%, 6,377 samples	271x
HD P530 (Server Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 5,499 samples	86x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	171x
THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 160%, 14,022 samples	73x
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	61x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	60x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	32x
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 40%, 22,543 samples	32x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16