| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141202 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 13 '21 at 23:03 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 31% |
PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52.6%
Above average
|
48% 82.8 Pts
|
36% 306 Pts
|
23% 373 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
Asus(1043 845B) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89
|
17.3%
Very poor
|
16% 22.9 fps
|
20% 24.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 60 76 54 20 27 MB/s
|
39.7%
Below average
|
43% 58.8 MB/s
|
88% 0.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 4096 MB
|
24.1%
Poor
|
24% 8.23 GB/s
|
16% 5.5 GB/s
|
39% 104 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,854 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 505x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 324x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 185x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 90x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $138 |