Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 640 5,045 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	47% Average	Memory 60.9 1-Core 83.3 2-Core 140 55% 94.6 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 184 26% 189 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M 15,328 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 1672) 2GB CLim: 672 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3.21% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 1.8 3% 3.43 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3.2 3% 4.33 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.21% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asgard AS250GS3-S7 256GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.15.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 215 217 215 218 217 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.6% Average	Read 237 Write 105 Mixed 206 SusWrite 212 43% 190 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 11.6 53% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 29.2 59% 119 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 46%
Generic Flash Disk 64GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 32GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 5 4.3 4.7 4.5 4.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	2.75% Terrible	Read 8 Write 2.5 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 4.5 6% 5.05 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.75% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT351S6AFR8C-G7 0080 RebotoDDR3 4G 1066 8GB 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.8% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 10.5 24% 8.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	17x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GBUnknownBench 26%, 228 samples	3x
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 1x4GBUnknownBench 21%, 215 samples	3x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 24%, 8,698 samples	2x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16