| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Biostar H110MH PRO D4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160215 |
| Uptime | 10.2 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 13 '21 at 02:23 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | SLV-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.2%
Good
|
78% 134 Pts
|
26% 199 Pts
|
12% 199 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.1%
Poor
|
27% 33.2 fps
|
25% 31.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
112GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 92 111 113 119 71 MB/s
|
70.6%
Very good
|
47% 214 MB/s
|
137% 54.3 MB/s
|
85% 113 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 34 77 92 100 94 MB/s
|
49.7%
Average
|
58% 79.1 MB/s
|
121% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G 9905643-012.A00G 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
58.7%
Above average
|
58% 20.1 GB/s
|
52% 18.2 GB/s
|
62% 64.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110MH PRO D4 Builds (Compare 189 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar H110MH PRO D4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 35x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 29x |
| Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 23x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 31x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 25x |
| HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 16,316 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |