PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H81M-DG4 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160314 |
Uptime | 1.4 Days |
Run Date | Apr 13 '21 at 01:14 |
Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.2%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 242 190 176 215 193 MB/s
|
89.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
94GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 180 156 141 205 145 MB/s
|
49.7%
Average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
95GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 97 93 97 101 117 MB/s
|
61.1%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
47.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 80x |
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples | 35x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 35x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 40x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 34x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 28x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $237 |