Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime11.3 Days
Run DateApr 12 '21 at 22:41
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$44
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 191
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 267
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
MSI(1462 3352) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 42.3
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 38.9
34% 40.6 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 0.2
19% 26.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 19 21 38 20 14 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.6% Average
Read 256
Write 212
Mixed 216
SusWrite 38.1
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 7.6
96% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 18.1
DQ Mixed 19.6
28% 54.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 90%
WD WD3200BUCT-63TWBY0 320GB
5GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 25 30 31 25 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 47%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
3GB free
Firmware: 1A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 45.7
Write 43
Mixed 39.5
32% 42.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
49% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 47%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
31GB free
Firmware: SHM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 125 129 133 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 23.2
Write 66.7
Mixed 51
SusWrite 129
50% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $344
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback