Asus P5Q

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100311
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '21 at 21:38
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5460-$190 10,360 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Memory 76.7 1-Core 54.5 2-Core 110 50% 80.2 Pts	4-Core 217 8-Core 218 29% 217 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	6.05% Terrible	Lighting 7.1 Reflection 9.6 Parallax 6.7 6% 7.8 fps	MRender 9.7 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 7 7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.05% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 225 219 228 227 227 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	73.6% Very good	Read 258 Write 246 Mixed 227 SusWrite 224 54% 239 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 56.4 4K Mixed 40.9 133% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 180 135% 181 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100 5,498 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 602GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 117 117 117 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 95.6 Write 88.1 Mixed 56.6 SusWrite 116 65% 89 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 68%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 74GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 65 65 65 64 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 65.6 Write 33.8 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 64.1 38% 51.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 7.2 22% 7.53 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 86.9 46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	74x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	56x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	38x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	23x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	21x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	10x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	193x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	90x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16