Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_X512JA

Performance Results

Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_X512JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JA
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateApr 12 '21 at 17:32
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 54.9
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 95.7
47% 74.7 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 194
22% 170 Pts
64-Core 194
13% 194 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1052) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.7
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 295 349 352 325 307 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 737
Write 793
Mixed 767
SusWrite 334
148% 658 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 18
83% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 247
186% 248 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 190%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 35 37 37 37 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 25
Write 26
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 35.7
40% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
72% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 16.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_X512JA Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_X512JA

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback