Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3060 2,183 User benchmarks, average bench 22% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Memory 22 1-Core 12.3 2-Core 22.7 13% 19 Pts	4-Core 36.1 8-Core 34.6 5% 35.3 Pts	64-Core 37.3 2% 37.3 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 81BB) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4424 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.54% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 2.7 1% 1.87 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.54% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPH3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 108 Write 113 Mixed 64.5 71% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
Generic MassStorageClass 8GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 7GB free, PID 0745 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.4 4.2 5.1 4.7 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	3.97% Terrible	Read 16.2 Write 1.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4.6 7% 6.68 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.97% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G3S186DJM.M8FN Hynix HMT451S6DFR8A-PB 8GB 1866, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.8% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 3.9 13% 4.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 306 13% 306 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Celeron J3060IntelBench 22%, 2,183 samples	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	1x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 1x4GBMicronBench 19%, 3,980 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16