Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive353% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '21 at 03:58
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$550
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 78
1-Core 165
2-Core 328
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 1,252
117% 946 Pts
64-Core 2,422
162% 2,422 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$390
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.4% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 92.6
Parallax 106
86% 102 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 101
Splatting 84.1
85% 104 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 95%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$200
545GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2170 2084 2078 2077 2059 2056 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
353% Outstanding
Read 2,786
Write 3,314
Mixed 1,913
SusWrite 2,088
568% 2,525 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 67.6
239% 87.7 MB/s
DQ Read 975
DQ Write 852
DQ Mixed 927
691% 918 MB/s
Poor: 285%
This bench: 353%
Great: 461%
Amd-raid Array 1 999GB
806GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 903 524 506 509 505 507 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 865
Write 944
Mixed 683
SusWrite 576
173% 767 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 28.8
105% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 229
187% 259 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 114%
Great: 440%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
114% Outstanding
MC Read 73.5
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 30.6
126% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 28.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 114%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 200%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 205%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,230
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $304Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback