Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 5% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N270 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 20% CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	22.1% Poor	Memory 42.8 1-Core 6.9 2-Core 10.9 17% 20.2 Pts	4-Core 11.2 8-Core 11.1 2% 11.1 Pts	64-Core 11.2 1% 11.2 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia ION 1,623 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 3651) 128MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	0.66% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 0.3 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.53 fps	MRender 1.2 Gravity 0.1 Splatting 1.1 1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.66% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS725032A9A364 320GB-$55 6,982 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 286GB free (System drive) Firmware: PC3OC72E SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 75 79 65 22 35 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Read 54.3 Write 67.9 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 51.2 41% 55.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 57%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 6GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 12 9.6 11 11 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	7.61% Terrible	Read 28.4 Write 23.1 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 10.7 21% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.61% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT112S6AFR8C-G7 1x1GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1 of 2 slots used 1GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	8.71% Terrible	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 2.4 8% 2.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 0.4 5% 1.73 GB/s	Latency 190 21% 190 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.71% Great: 9%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 16%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Atom N270IntelBench 20%, 3,302 samples	1x

GPU
IONNvidiaBench 1%, 1,623 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 120GBGigabyte $31Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	1x

RAM
M471B2873EH1-C7 Kingston 99U5469-016.A00LF 3GBSamsungBench 7%, 2 samples	1x

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $31

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16