Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Razer CH20
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 11 '21 at 15:55
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 217
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 664
64% 527 Pts
64-Core 772
48% 772 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.67% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 7.9
6% 7.83 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 10.8
6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.67%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 2002) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.7% Very good
Lighting 86.9
Reflection 96.8
Parallax 88.7
71% 90.8 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 79.6
Splatting 82.2
76% 95.3 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 443 427 418 490 441 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1938
Write 1,582
Mixed 189
SusWrite 447
229% 1,039 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 60.9
214% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,188
DQ Write 744
DQ Mixed 364
434% 766 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 214%
Great: 372%
ACASIS 512GB
403GB free
Firmware: 0208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 119 89 93 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 12% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
77.1% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 22.6
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 24
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback