Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190807
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '21 at 15:53
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 93.3 1-Core 128 2-Core 254 89% 159 Pts	4-Core 484 8-Core 471 64% 477 Pts	64-Core 453 28% 453 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 22,284 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 879B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48% Average	Lighting 60 Reflection 60.1 Parallax 52.9 49% 57.7 fps	MRender 64.6 Gravity 53.3 Splatting 53.2 46% 57 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$54 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 26 99 139 40 2 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 456 Write 365 Mixed 266 SusWrite 74.6 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 11.4 71% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 70.9 DQ Mixed 30.4 40% 72.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 55%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154 24,344 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 233GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 72 72 72 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 76 Write 41.2 Mixed 48.8 SusWrite 71.9 44% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 59%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 124GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 97 97 97 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 96.5 Write 92.4 Mixed 61.4 SusWrite 96.3 64% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	44.1% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 11.8 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 13.1 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-K R2.0 Builds (Compare 7,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	3,203x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,501x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	460x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	723x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	563x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	514x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	435x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $54Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	309x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	298x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	206x
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	162x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	138x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $359

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16