Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4100-$110 32,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Memory 81.6 1-Core 56.7 2-Core 106 52% 81.6 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 167 22% 165 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 58%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 70 62 45 65 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 374 Write 311 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 98.9 44% 202 MB/s	4K Read 8.7 4K Write 10.4 4K Mixed 0.4 19% 6.5 MB/s	DQ Read 23.3 DQ Write 76.6 DQ Mixed 21 24% 40.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 99%
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 221GB free Firmware: SBFA12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 92 90 91 90 91 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.3% Average	Read 271 Write 174 Mixed 220 SusWrite 130 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 39.3 4K Mixed 25.3 89% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 32.1 DQ Write 61.3 DQ Mixed 33.1 29% 42.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	41.6% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 15.6 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 10.6 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $395

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16