Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 11 '21 at 09:46
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 81.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 258
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 736
73% 597 Pts
64-Core 884
55% 884 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 114
Parallax 144
115% 133 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 130
Splatting 106
108% 137 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
516GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 817 641 467 438 472 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1524
Write 1,704
Mixed 1,350
SusWrite 698
296% 1,319 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 71.1
242% 88.7 MB/s
DQ Read 953
DQ Write 712
DQ Mixed 840
626% 835 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 216%
Great: 276%
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67
169GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 401 421 424 421 424 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 446
Mixed 306
SusWrite 408
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 48.5
166% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 165
135% 192 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 106%
Great: 117%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
487GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 176 176 176 175 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 129
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 175
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 34.5
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 25.1
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback