Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive334% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 12:55
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$417
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 74.8
1-Core 162
2-Core 322
101% 186 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 1,061
101% 815 Pts
64-Core 1,660
111% 1,660 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.2% Above average
Lighting 69.8
Reflection 81.8
Parallax 72.5
56% 74.7 fps
MRender 76.8
Gravity 71.1
Splatting 63.8
58% 70.6 fps
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 67%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$146
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2219 2065 1325 1302 1275 1280 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2,539
Write 2418
Mixed 1,848
SusWrite 1,578
470% 2,096 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 88.1
279% 97.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,318
DQ Write 877
DQ Mixed 1,109
824% 1,101 MB/s
Poor: 245%
This bench: 334%
Great: 374%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 209 211 213 214 214 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 89.8
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 210
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$79
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.9% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 24.1
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 24.5
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 21,098 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,140
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $210Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $102SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback