Asus Z87-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z87-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory16.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131003
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 12:08
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 97
1-Core 122
2-Core 235
87% 152 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 624
65% 523 Pts
64-Core 659
41% 659 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 13AA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 154
Parallax 155
126% 154 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 136
Splatting 0.1
77% 108 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 107%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
624GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 905 474 479 479 475 480 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
788GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 769 766 764 767 765 762 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Hitachi HUS724040ALA640 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MFAOAA70
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 99 96 98 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 97.3
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 141 139 141 140 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 159
Write 117
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 141
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 101%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 70 70 70 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 131
Write 131
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 70.2
123% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.5
223% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 52%
Seagate Backup+ BL 1TB
930GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 68 68 68 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 108
Write 69.9
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 67.8
96% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37%
Great: 44%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
172GB free, PID 61f5
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 112 111 111 111 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 296
Write 279
Mixed 262
SusWrite 112
312% 237 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 41.6
3,683% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 36.4
DQ Write 79.5
DQ Mixed 47.3
4,448% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 269%
Great: 379%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Xtreem-LV-2400 0423 Vulcan-2400 0423 Xtreem-LV-2400 0423 Vulcan-2400 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75% Very good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 23.5
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 24.4
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 50.3
80% 50.3 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z87-PLUS - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $502
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback