Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	97.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '21 at 11:01
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Memory 64.9 1-Core 138 2-Core 272 84% 158 Pts	4-Core 546 8-Core 1,066 95% 806 Pts	64-Core 2,024 125% 2,024 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 C750) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.9% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 106 Parallax 120 98% 115 fps	MRender 157 Gravity 112 Splatting 100 98% 123 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 237GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 346 349 352 349 347 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Read 470 Write 367 Mixed 332 SusWrite 342 85% 378 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 77.5 4K Mixed 37.8 136% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 186 146% 201 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 207GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1749 854 857 852 849 831 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	301% Outstanding	Read 2,428 Write 2,360 Mixed 1,804 SusWrite 999 425% 1,898 MB/s	4K Read 63.2 4K Write 161 4K Mixed 86.4 292% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,266 DQ Write 1,095 DQ Mixed 1,183 886% 1,181 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 301% Great: 355%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 141 136 142 159 162 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 155 Mixed 77.4 SusWrite 146 102% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB 54,117 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	65.3% Good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 24.2 68% 23.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 23.2 55% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 112%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	846x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	706x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	421x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	433x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	185x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	156x

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,732

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16