PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 20.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191114 |
Uptime | 3.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 09 '21 at 22:34 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 71% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
67.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Jamesdonkey JD240-LE 240GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JD2019
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 2.6 13 63 44 12 MB/s
|
20.3%
Poor
|
|||
Geil R3_512GB 512GB
159GB free
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 96 7.7 72 4.1 104 MB/s
|
46.9%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
670GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 187 187 190 190 187 MB/s
|
113%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown NMUD480E82-3000D 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
|
70.1%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 763x |
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 703x |
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 295x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 303x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 279x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 249x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 93% - Outstanding | Total price: $434 |