Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 09 '21 at 22:25
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 86.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 198
79% 133 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 627
67% 520 Pts
64-Core 782
52% 782 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$450
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3249 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 118
Parallax 144
113% 134 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 133
Splatting 108
108% 128 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 111%
Great: 116%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$48
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 385 343 396 388 370 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 479
Write 417
Mixed 415
SusWrite 369
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 28.9
109% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 37.3
DQ Write 74.9
DQ Mixed 52.2
41% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
306GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 138 132 137 128 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 144
Mixed 86
SusWrite 134
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
428GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 102 107 101 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 155
Write 150
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 104
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 109%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
362GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 102 99 102 96 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 90.6
Write 70.2
Mixed 50
SusWrite 99.3
103% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 43%
SMI USB DISK 16GB
15GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 4.3 5.4 4.5 5.2 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.73% Terrible
Read 8
Write 5.8
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 5.6
10% 7.22 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.73%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 34.3
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 28.2
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,575 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $886
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback