Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191129
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 09 '21 at 10:41
Run Duration325 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 1,070
99% 829 Pts
64-Core 1,544
96% 1,544 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
Gigabyte(1458 37AF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3689 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 171
Parallax 188
142% 178 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 149
Splatting 125
123% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
478GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 186 186 187 188 188 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 330
Write 300
Mixed 314
SusWrite 187
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 31.2
113% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 210
157% 210 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
482GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 186 186 183 184 183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
67% Good
Read 353
Write 327
Mixed 300
SusWrite 185
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 27.8
105% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 210
157% 210 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 67%
Great: 133%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
214GB free
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 136 151 166 168 159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 310
Write 208
Mixed 223
SusWrite 154
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 25.9
89% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 128
108% 155 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57%
Great: 85%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
13GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 436
Write 418
Mixed 345
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 33.4
112% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 328
254% 348 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
383GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1292 994 1003 1048 1021 1063 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,878
Write 1,650
Mixed 1,391
SusWrite 1,070
336% 1,497 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 62.6
197% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,026
DQ Write 745
DQ Mixed 912
674% 894 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 242%
Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,874
Write 1,726
Mixed 1,350
367% 1,650 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 45.8
149% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,056
DQ Write 773
DQ Mixed 934
693% 921 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate ST3120811AS 120GB-$179
21GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 48.7
Write 16.7
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 39.7
26% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 33%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 1TB
814GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 21 19 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 36.1
Write 35.3
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 21.7
36% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 49%
Generic External 500GB
411GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 21 21 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 35.1
Write 32.5
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 22
38% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2A2666C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 27.6
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 28.8
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming X Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $941
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback