bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181023
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateApr 08 '21 at 22:57
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 146
60% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 189
25% 183 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 2002) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
0.8% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 3
0% 1.57 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.8%
Great: 1%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.8% Below average
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 42
Parallax 39.2
30% 39.6 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 28.4
32% 34.9 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$164
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 180 114 113 111 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 459
Write 389
Mixed 324
SusWrite 162
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 28.3
98% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 277
215% 298 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 123%
Seagate ST3000DM003-1F216N 3TB
740GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 98 103 99 97 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 93.3
Write 70.4
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 100
60% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
21GB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 152 151 153 151 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 65.5
Write 81.3
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 151
132% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
196% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 9905471-006.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 9905471-006.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.7% Below average
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical bin Builds (Compare 33,462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $329
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $215Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback