Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	38.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200728
Uptime	8.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '21 at 22:20
Run Duration	303 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Memory 71.5 1-Core 64.2 2-Core 117 52% 84.3 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 365 34% 286 Pts	64-Core 461 28% 461 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.8% Above average	Lighting 66.2 Reflection 70.2 Parallax 89 54% 75.1 fps	MRender 61.3 Gravity 63.1 Splatting 43.6 45% 56 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 921 1020 1000 990 1019 974 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	139% Outstanding	Read 1,110 Write 39.5 Mixed 280 SusWrite 987 133% 604 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 28.8 4K Mixed 23.5 79% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 215 159% 213 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 236%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 10GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 362 371 355 375 351 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 413 Write 38.3 Mixed 200 SusWrite 363 56% 254 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 22.4 80% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 91.7 DQ Mixed 110 96% 149 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 108%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 290GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 917 508 506 508 507 508 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$69 13,482 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 173GB free Firmware: X61110RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 392 347 388 398 325 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 432 Write 392 Mixed 281 SusWrite 370 83% 369 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 22.7 68% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 130 122% 190 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 119%
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 79GB free Firmware: MU01.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 52 52 53 53 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	50% Above average	Read 394 Write 376 Mixed 87.2 SusWrite 86.9 52% 236 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 19.3 4K Mixed 18.1 62% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 76.5 97% 174 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 91%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 931GB free Firmware: M3CR033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 390 387 384 394 377 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Read 390 Write 344 Mixed 326 SusWrite 383 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 22.6 76% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 214 161% 216 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 112GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 125 125 126 126 124 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	65% Good	Read 104 Write 63.8 Mixed 62 SusWrite 123 65% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2D3000C16 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2D3000C16 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 64GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	81.1% Excellent	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 32.1 88% 30.8 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 19.7 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 98 41% 98 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)