HP 240 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP 240 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 855E
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200612
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 08 '21 at 22:12
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron N4100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 38.8
1-Core 52.4
2-Core 106
38% 65.9 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 206
28% 205 Pts
64-Core 199
13% 199 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
HP(103C 855E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7926
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.83% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.33 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.7
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD WD5000LPZX-08Z10 500GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 95 100 102 109 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 144
Write 129
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 100
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown HKED4082BAB1D0JA1 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.4% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 11.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 208
19% 208 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 240 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 240 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $215Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback