Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics60% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA550
Memory4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200413
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateApr 08 '21 at 22:02
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 162
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 419
43% 347 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Device(1A58 200C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6589
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 79.5
Parallax 78.8
57% 76.2 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 68.5
65% 81.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 60%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 653 532 502 449 428 368 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,748
Write 1,466
Mixed 1,119
SusWrite 488
269% 1,205 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 48.5
160% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 693
DQ Write 496
DQ Mixed 578
436% 589 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 176%
Great: 297%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
371GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1359 1429 1063 990 1065 1182 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,699
Write 1,597
Mixed 1,299
SusWrite 1,181
324% 1,444 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 48.3
164% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 692
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 586
438% 588 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 217%
Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 19.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 Builds (Compare 2,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback