Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	21GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 21GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 months ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	19.9 GB free of 21 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160531
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '21 at 21:51
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 300,263 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 70.3 1-Core 76.8 2-Core 150 59% 98.9 Pts	4-Core 267 8-Core 500 48% 383 Pts	64-Core 494 33% 494 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$400 313,119 User benchmarks, average bench 105% Gigabyte(1458 2313) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 125 Reflection 139 Parallax 191 101% 152 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 134 Splatting 96.2 106% 115 fps
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 114%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$110 389,170 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 442GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 374 371 387 379 371 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 431 Write 367 Mixed 371 SusWrite 358 86% 382 MB/s	4K Read 36.7 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 38.4 130% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 176 125% 162 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 135%
Seagate Expansion 5TB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2TB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 115 111 116 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 92.2 Write 116 Mixed 68.6 SusWrite 117 136% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.6 177% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F6451U64F9333G F6451U64F9333G Corsair CMX16GX3M2A1333C9 Corsair CMX16GX3M2A1333C9 21GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz 4096, 1024, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.7% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 9.8 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 7.9 22% 7.77 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 3,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $140

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 66%, 300,263 samples	891x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 60%, 230,102 samples	806x
FX-8320AMD $163Bench 64%, 100,317 samples	397x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 743,604 samples	261x
RX 570AMD $150Bench 47%, 306,061 samples	209x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,100,889 samples	186x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $32Bench 66%, 270,305 samples	132x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $66Bench 107%, 556,834 samples	132x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 104%, 772,089 samples	84x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 58%, 82,165 samples	147x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 50%, 31,573 samples	73x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 42,805 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $457

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $265	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $215	Nvidia RTX 3080 $700	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16