Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	8.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0 (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181122
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '21 at 17:57
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	82%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9500 APU (2016 D.BR) 2,296 User benchmarks, average bench 34% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	Memory 27.6 1-Core 47.6 2-Core 86 30% 53.7 Pts	4-Core 81 8-Core 75.1 11% 78.1 Pts	64-Core 79.3 5% 79.3 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 13,858 User benchmarks, average bench 5% AMD(1002 1E60) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	8.21% Terrible	Lighting 10.2 Reflection 10.1 Parallax 13.8 8% 11.4 fps	MRender 8.4 Gravity 10.6 Splatting 10.1 8% 9.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.21% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 662GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 122 123 127 154 151 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 165 Write 128 Mixed 80.9 SusWrite 131 93% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 113%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 4,486 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.8 11 11 12 5.2 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	7.55% Terrible	Read 21.5 Write 7.5 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 8.3 12% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 58% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.55% Great: 10%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB 4,300 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 79GB free, PID 61b3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 31 28 35 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 30.1 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 30.5 41% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GBF1X08QFHH39-135-K 2x8GB 1,600 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 8.3 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 8.1 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 269 15% 269 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-DVS R4.0 Builds (Compare 758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	117x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	82x
Ryzen 5 1600AFAMD $97Bench 72%, 52,721 samples	54x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	50x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	52x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	16x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	24x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 17,908 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16