HP 870-109ns

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 days ago, 2 days ago.
SystemHP 870-109ns  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 828A
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180208
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 08 '21 at 16:48
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$299
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 197
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 559
58% 454 Pts
64-Core 558
37% 558 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$304
Gigabyte(1458 401B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.3% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 98.9
Parallax 68.9
58% 79.7 fps
MRender 58.1
Gravity 66.4
Splatting 55.6
52% 60 fps
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 64%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 176 167 163 168 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 421
Write 388
Mixed 337
SusWrite 182
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 52.1
176% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 321
244% 330 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
467GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 151 153 153 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 165
Mixed 110
SusWrite 152
110% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
835GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 138 138 139 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 142
Write 144
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 138
146% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
68.4% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 20.3
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 20.1
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 870-109ns Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: HP 870-109ns

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $519
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $173Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $316Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback