Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 131% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '21 at 16:29
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Memory 90.2 1-Core 157 2-Core 316 102% 188 Pts	4-Core 484 8-Core 490 65% 487 Pts	64-Core 448 28% 448 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gigabyte(1458 4069) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	151% Outstanding	Lighting 224 Reflection 199 Parallax 209 183% 211 fps	MRender 195 Gravity 148 Splatting 130 126% 158 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 163 162 161 160 158 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	179% Outstanding	Read 1,342 Write 918 Mixed 536 SusWrite 215 166% 753 MB/s	4K Read 48 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 48.4 214% 81.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,141 DQ Write 1,027 DQ Mixed 649 606% 939 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 236%
Samsung MZYLF128HCHP-000L2 128GB 3,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 119GB free Firmware: FXT63L1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 128 129 131 130 128 MB/s Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.9% Average	Read 188 Write 122 Mixed 140 SusWrite 128 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 21.8 89% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 27.4 DQ Write 42.5 DQ Mixed 24.1 21% 31.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 135GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 194 195 195 195 198 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 138 Mixed 85.4 SusWrite 194 111% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 114%
Toshiba MQ01ABB200 2TB 1,626 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 508GB free Firmware: AY000U SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 88 88 88 88 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 72.3 Write 76.2 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 87.3 48% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 61%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB 7,767 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 216 217 217 216 218 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 139 Write 145 Mixed 52 SusWrite 213 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 123%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 6GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.9 5.3 6.3 6.6 6.8 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 57.1 Write 8.5 Mixed 12.4 SusWrite 6.1 20% 21 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.8 66% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 16%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2.5TB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 122 125 126 124 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 145 Write 132 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 122 134% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 76,101 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77.1% Very good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 24.7 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 30 SC Mixed 23.1 68% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	3,889x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	763x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	361x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	905x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	781x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	776x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	267x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	265x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	196x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	355x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	288x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	138x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,232

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16