Intel X79

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	29 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '21 at 15:33
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 78.9 1-Core 63.2 2-Core 134 56% 92.1 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 524 44% 380 Pts	64-Core 842 52% 842 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50% Average	Lighting 60.6 Reflection 71.8 Parallax 64.2 49% 65.5 fps	MRender 70 Gravity 62.7 Splatting 57.3 51% 63.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ256 256GB 755 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 833 774 739 166 175 177 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 926 Write 742 Mixed 669 SusWrite 478 158% 704 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 38.8 148% 53.8 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 501 DQ Mixed 416 312% 407 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 185%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 378GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 126 126 126 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	72% Very good	Read 124 Write 34.5 Mixed 68.9 SusWrite 126 65% 88.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4A 2x8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 18.4 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.6 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	338x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	267x
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples	143x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	126x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	113x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	107x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	63x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	45x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	35x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	127x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	62x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16