Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 08 '21 at 14:23
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 230
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 824
80% 656 Pts
64-Core 1,277
79% 1,277 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.3% Very good
Lighting 97.1
Reflection 114
Parallax 100
79% 104 fps
MRender 97.7
Gravity 96.7
Splatting 88.3
76% 94.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 480GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSBG200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 158 123 173 147 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 435
Write 387
Mixed 372
SusWrite 176
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 34.2
122% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 247
203% 289 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 95%
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69
0GB free
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,266
Write 1,270
Mixed 715
241% 1,084 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 49.4
181% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 963
DQ Write 423
DQ Mixed 617
478% 668 MB/s
Poor: 136% Great: 262%
Samsung 850 Evo 4TB-$470
3TB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 433 422 412 426 429 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 450
Mixed 407
SusWrite 422
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 42.6
154% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 352
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 152 153 153 153 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 158
Mixed 110
SusWrite 152
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 98%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 90 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 168
Write 132
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 89.7
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74%
Great: 98%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB
25GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 1.8 2.4 7.1 4.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
8.78% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 9
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.9
10% 9.08 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.4
144% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 8.78%
Great: 10%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
14GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 41.6
Write 13.6
Mixed 16.6
SusWrite 15.2
25% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.9
68% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 33%
Lexar SD WorkflowSR1 128GB
68GB free, PID ba03
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 87 87 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 88.8
Write 86.5
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 85.4
97% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 44%
Lexar SD WorkflowSR1 128GB
83GB free, PID ba03
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 87 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 89.5
Write 79.2
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 85.3
95% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
91% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 44%
Lexar SD WorkflowSR1 128GB
88GB free, PID ba03
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 83 82 83 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 89.7
Write 81.4
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 82.5
104% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 5.2
336% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 51.1
MC Write 53.2
MC Mixed 44.6
142% 49.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 21.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 124%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback