Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190909
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 08 '21 at 13:41
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$485
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 277
94% 167 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 1,074
100% 813 Pts
64-Core 2077
139% 2077 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
CLim: 945 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 41.2
26% 35.4 fps
MRender 29.1
Gravity 30
Splatting 23.4
24% 27.5 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 26%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$67
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 988 516 499 472 476 487 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2,025
Write 2,335
Mixed 1,784
SusWrite 573
377% 1,679 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 80.2
285% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,323
DQ Write 1,096
DQ Mixed 1,190
897% 1,203 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 258%
Great: 290%
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
328GB free
Firmware: V1.7.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1897 1896 1879 1841 1898 1893 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,145
Write 1,835
Mixed 571
SusWrite 1,884
360% 1,609 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 66.8
261% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 1,306
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 384
426% 741 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 321%
Great: 266%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 153 157 155 157 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 172
Write 154
Mixed 109
SusWrite 155
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 0.8
10% 4.27 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 1.1
2% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 23%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
31GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 11 11 8.9 3.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.48% Terrible
Read 12
Write 9.7
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 10.3
13% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.48%
Great: 9%
Generic MassStorageClass 64GB
55GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 33 39 34 38 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 91.9
Write 26.2
Mixed 28
SusWrite 36
51% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 4.3
299% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 46.2
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 36.6
118% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 34.1
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 20,132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,167
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $215Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback