HP Laptop 15-ra0xx

Performance Results

Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 25%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-ra0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 832C
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190517
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 08 '21 at 13:40
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron N3060
CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Memory 33.9
1-Core 28.4
2-Core 53.1
24% 38.5 Pts
4-Core 54.5
8-Core 53.3
7% 53.9 Pts
64-Core 54.6
4% 54.6 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
HP(103C 832C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.29% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 2.4
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.1
1% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.29%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6104006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 106 107 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 346
Write 224
Mixed 227
SusWrite 109
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 27
89% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 94.5
DQ Write 88.6
DQ Mixed 84.7
66% 89.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata AO1L16BC4R1-BX7S 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.13 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 2.1
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 233
17% 233 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Laptop 15-ra0xx Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 25%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-ra0xx

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $215Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback