Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '21 at 13:21
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	52.2% Above average	Memory 51.7 1-Core 55.9 2-Core 161 48% 89.5 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 626 52% 454 Pts	64-Core 860 53% 860 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 8641) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.7% Average	Lighting 45.9 Reflection 47.1 Parallax 63.8 37% 52.3 fps	MRender 62.7 Gravity 67.5 Splatting 64 53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 369 448 446 442 411 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 465 Mixed 302 SusWrite 406 93% 415 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 86 4K Mixed 39.8 145% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 132 155% 270 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 527GB free Firmware: CC1H SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 106 109 108 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 108 Write 105 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 108 70% 94.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 70%
WD 1600BEV External 160GB 271 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 122GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 33 Write 37.6 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 19.5 38% 28.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 20%
Imation Apollo M300 1TB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 220GB free, PID 1912 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 37 Write 38.8 Mixed 22.1 SusWrite 19.6 38% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GB 5,242 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	40% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 14.7 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 6 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 155 26% 155 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)