User System

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Destroyer	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	ECT
Motherboard	ASUSTeK PRIME B350-PLUS
Memory	20 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	9 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '21 at 13:00
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X Eight-Core 630 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 70 1-Core 116 2-Core 221 75% 136 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 656 63% 522 Pts	64-Core 1,142 71% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C303) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	85.1% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 53.6 Parallax 101 88% 87.6 fps	MRender 81.7 Gravity 111 Splatting 96.3 79% 96.4 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB 16,974 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE4500RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 425 Write 228 Mixed 241 66% 298 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 17.2 65% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 75.1 DQ Mixed 35 42% 75.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 55%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 81GB free Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 40 192 105 114 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 444 Write 343 Mixed 206 SusWrite 130 62% 281 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 34.1 4K Mixed 17.4 65% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 88.8 DQ Mixed 41.5 48% 83.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 55%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 153GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 102 100 101 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Read 167 Write 153 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 101 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 107%
Seagate ST1000LM014-SSHD-8GB 1TB 16,795 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 172GB free Firmware: LVD6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 97 97 94 97 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Read 76 Write 40 Mixed 55 SusWrite 95.3 49% 66.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.6 250% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$80 110,884 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	82.2% Excellent	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 31.7 86% 30.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 24.2 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 101 39% 101 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16