HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 30 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 27 days ago, 26 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 23 days ago, 23 days ago, 23 days ago, 23 days ago, 22 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 19 days ago, 18 days ago, 18 days ago, 18 days ago, 18 days ago, 18 days ago, 18 days ago, 18 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 17 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 15 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago, 10 days ago, 10 days ago, 10 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 3 days ago, 3 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 10 hrs ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '21 at 10:19
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 207
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 392
54% 392 Pts
64-Core 391
26% 391 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.4
Reflection 24
Parallax 20.6
16% 21.3 fps
MRender 16.5
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 17.3
15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$49
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 344 419 439 436 440 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 438
Mixed 429
SusWrite 394
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 38.5
124% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 277
231% 334 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BDW0-GN-F Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB EBJ20UF8BDW0-GN-F Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 18.1
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 11.1
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 2,403 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $155
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i7-10700K $315Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback