Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics94.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '21 at 10:03
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$299
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 250
92% 159 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 694
73% 572 Pts
64-Core 694
47% 694 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$450
Nvidia(10DE 1F02) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.9% Outstanding
Lighting 106
Reflection 144
Parallax 96.4
86% 115 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 123
Splatting 105
106% 134 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 118%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$68
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 86 85 85 84 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 430
Write 146
Mixed 214
SusWrite 106
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4.1
81% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 131%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$63
183GB free
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 195 193 180 173 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 469
Write 199
Mixed 269
SusWrite 186
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 14
83% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 20.4
60% 140 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 125%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
126GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 300 292 112 110 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 2,452
Write 309
Mixed 516
SusWrite 204
187% 870 MB/s
4K Read 76.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4.2
122% 27.5 MB/s
Poor: 198%
This bench: 143%
Great: 333%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$120
931GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 174 172 169 167 169 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 474
Write 182
Mixed 246
SusWrite 171
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 4.6
80% 18.4 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 137%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 105
Write 14.9
Mixed 24
SusWrite 13.7
29% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
262% 2 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 62%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$450
919GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.6 6.9 6.9 7 6.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.1% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 15.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 19.5
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 54.5
73% 54.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 9,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,182
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i7-10700K $315Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback