| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 94.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200714 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 08 '21 at 05:50 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | NOR-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
78.9%
Very good
|
84% 154 Pts
|
82% 647 Pts
|
71% 1,052 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44.1%
Average
|
46% 55.6 fps
|
42% 47.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA480CV10001 480GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STWSH012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 414 455 464 466 462 MB/s
|
94.6%
Outstanding
|
67% 298 MB/s
|
140% 51.4 MB/s
|
148% 219 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 217 217 218 220 220 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
67.6%
Good
|
70% 24.5 GB/s
|
57% 19.9 GB/s
|
38% 106 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 14,943 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $236Bench 84%, 811,635 samples | 3,607x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $185Bench 77%, 653,266 samples | 2,698x |
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $310Bench 81%, 429,200 samples | 1,180x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $220Bench 54%, 633,782 samples | 1,344x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $338Bench 89%, 399,533 samples | 1,061x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 234,706 samples | 1,000x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $567 |