| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-E/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190528 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 08 '21 at 05:00 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 38% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.2%
Good
|
70% 125 Pts
|
43% 320 Pts
|
20% 327 Pts
|
| Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.6%
Poor
|
26% 34.7 fps
|
25% 31.4 fps
| |
|
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
|
4.19%
Terrible
|
5% 5.47 fps
|
3% 4.53 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
T-force 500GB 500GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 251 118 113 116 130 MB/s
|
92.4%
Outstanding
|
80% 359 MB/s
|
152% 53.6 MB/s
|
153% 274 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
104GB free
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 122 121 116 86 87 MB/s
|
67.7%
Good
|
66% 92.4 MB/s
|
129% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 1x8GB-$25
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30%
Below average
|
28% 9.7 GB/s
|
28% 9.63 GB/s
|
48% 84.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,410 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 211x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 186x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 167x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 176x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 167x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 108x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |