Asus FX503VD

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

System	Asus FX503VD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX503VD
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200716
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '21 at 21:14
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	14%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 81.9 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 193 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 328 46% 339 Pts	64-Core 325 20% 325 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Asus(1043 1B90) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6589 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Lighting 30.2 Reflection 38.6 Parallax 31.9 25% 33.6 fps	MRender 34.5 Gravity 33.5 Splatting 20.3 23% 29.4 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30200P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 256 253 260 258 259 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	75.3% Very good	Read 397 Write 260 Mixed 205 SusWrite 253 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 63 4K Mixed 22.5 100% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 185 173% 270 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 83%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 464GB free Firmware: JA0OA5M0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 79 79 80 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 60.9 Write 63.4 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 80.5 42% 57.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 86D3 SP008GBSFU240B02 16GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 30.5 MC Mixed 23.4 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 21.1 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 77.1 52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FX503VD Builds (Compare 1,127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus FX503VD

CPU
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	698x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	429x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	701x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	425x
Graphics i gfx-driver-ci-master-9938 DCH-IIntelBench 5%, 8 samples	1x

SSD
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	121x
SD8SN8U256G1002 256GBSandiskBench 66%, 4,445 samples	107x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	36x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	413x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	65x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16