ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 4158G7U

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 4158G7U (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110408
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '21 at 18:46
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620 5,965 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1366-pin LGA, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 81 1-Core 60.7 2-Core 129 55% 90.3 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 425 39% 328 Pts	64-Core 628 39% 628 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 5000 751 User benchmarks, average bench 10% HP(103C 0770) 2.5GB CLim: 513 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2.5GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Lighting 12.1 Reflection 22.8 Parallax 15.4 10% 16.8 fps	MRender 22.2 Gravity 10.4 Splatting 15.1 13% 15.9 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000H1 128GB 2,337 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 29 26 29 28 27 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.9% Below average	Read 237 Write 80.5 Mixed 68 SusWrite 29 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 31.9 4K Mixed 14.2 53% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 35.5 DQ Mixed 47.8 53% 95 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 79%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA641 3TB 2,582 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 151GB free Firmware: MKAOA840 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 86 86 86 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 79.3 Write 76.8 Mixed 51.2 SusWrite 85.6 54% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 88%
Hitachi HUS724040ALA640 4TB 1,620 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2.5TB free Firmware: MFAOAC50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 152 152 153 152 152 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Read 159 Write 165 Mixed 71 SusWrite 152 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT8GC72B4NB1NJ-CG 00C2 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D 16GB 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.5% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 11.5 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.8 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback